Written by Iván Fernández and Edgar Paz
Iván and Edgar are basketball analysts and founders of Pick StatsGal
Statistics has always been closely related with basketball. There has always been a global interest to know who was the player with most scoring points, how many rebounds a team could grab... but all these basic figures were sometimes difficult to translate to a player’s impact on a team or to measure how good a team was. Is it really better the offense of a team scoring 90 points per game than a team scoring 80 points per game?
Then, advanced statistics were introduced to basketball: the concept of basketball as a turn-taking game and metrics like pace to measure the number of possessions in a game brought a new vision to stats. Mathematical regression models to see the real impact of a player in a team and statistics based on different player combinations allowed staff to evaluate performance in a much more accurate way.
K. Punter
FC Barcelona
46
T. Maledon
ASVEL
39
I. Cordinier
Virtus Bologna
36
N. Hifi
Paris Basketball
33
F. Campazzo
Real Madrid
33
T. J. Shorts
Paris Basketball
31
S. Francisco
Žalgiris Kaunas
31
J. Hoard
Maccabi Tel Aviv
30
W. Clyburn
Virtus Bologna
30
E. Fournier
Olympiacos
30
C. Edwards
Bayern Munich
29
C. Moneke
Baskonia
27
S. Napier
Bayern Munich
27
T. Shengelia
Virtus Bologna
27
M. Hezonja
Real Madrid
26
K. Nunn
Panathinaikos
26
T. Forrest
Baskonia
26
Y. D. Santos
Crvena Zvezda
26
M. James
AS Monaco
25
J. Vesely
FC Barcelona
25
The power of stats has been so strong that it has expanded into the most important leagues worldwide, bringing new technology to record as much information as possible for later analysis. This expansion has proven so successful that it has changed the way teams design plays—focusing on open 3-point shots in catch-and-shoot situations or using pick-and-roll for advantages.
Baskonia
65.00%
Olympiacos
64.83%
Anadolu Efes
63.39%
EA7 Emporio Armani Milan
62.69%
Panathinaikos
61.86%
Crvena Zvezda
61.69%
ASVEL
61.56%
Virtus Bologna
61.54%
Žalgiris Kaunas
61.53%
AS Monaco
60.70%
Fenerbahçe S.K.
60.44%
Partizan Belgrade
59.62%
Bayern Munich
58.79%
FC Barcelona
57.54%
Real Madrid
56.39%
Alba Berlin
54.12%
Maccabi Tel Aviv
52.36%
Paris Basketball
47.56%
S. Vezenkov
Vezenkov
Olympiacos
7.16
7.16
T. J. Shorts
Shorts
Paris Basketball
6.34
6.34
F. Petrusev
Petrusev
Crvena Zvezda
5.78
5.78
N. Mirotic
Mirotic
EA7 Emporio Armani Milan
5.43
5.43
K. Nunn
Nunn
Panathinaikos
4.92
4.92
F. Campazzo
Campazzo
Real Madrid
4.33
4.33
D. Thompson
Thompson
Anadolu Efes
4.28
4.28
N. Weiler-Babb
Weiler-Babb
Bayern Munich
4.28
4.28
R. Beaubois
Beaubois
Anadolu Efes
4.2
4.2
K. Punter
Punter
FC Barcelona
4.15
4.15
N. Rogkavopoulos
Rogkavopoulos
Baskonia
4.12
4.12
V. Poirier
Poirier
Anadolu Efes
4.11
4.11
S. Larkin
Larkin
Anadolu Efes
4.09
4.09
T. Maledon
Maledon
ASVEL
4.03
4.03
M. Lessort
Lessort
Panathinaikos
3.72
3.72
Teams that are winning championships dedicate more effort to these analyses each year because the competitive advantage they deliver helps teams achieve their goals and titles.
It’s in the NBA where advanced analytics have had the greatest impact, and it’s where some of the most innovative metrics have been developed, which we’ve been able to apply to FIBA basketball as well, such as APM (Adjusted Plus Minus) and RAPM (Regularized Adjusted Plus Minus). APM estimates a player’s influence on a team’s point margin through mathematical regression, taking the point margin of each combination of players who participated in each possession and applying mathematical regression methods.
M. Jantunen
Jantunen
Paris Basketball
0.0838
0.08
0.5382
0.53
N. Weiler-Babb
Weiler-Babb
Bayern Munich
0.0832
0.08
0.2384
0.23
W. Tavares
Tavares
Real Madrid
0.0723
0.07
0.1596
0.15
N. Mirotic
Mirotic
EA7 Emporio Armani Milan
0.0719
0.07
0.2702
0.27
S. Vezenkov
Vezenkov
Olympiacos
0.0623
0.06
0.2716
0.27
K. Nunn
Nunn
Panathinaikos
0.0588
0.05
0.1356
0.13
A. Roberson
Roberson
ASVEL
0.0562
0.05
0.243
0.24
J. Hernangomez
Hernangomez
Panathinaikos
0.0535
0.05
0.1872
0.18
Y. D. Santos
Santos
Crvena Zvezda
0.0516
0.05
0.216
0.21
T. Forrest
Forrest
Baskonia
0.0514
0.05
0.3538
0.35
K. Punter
Punter
FC Barcelona
0.0505
0.05
0.1884
0.18
S. Larkin
Larkin
Anadolu Efes
0.0495
0.04
0.0981
0.09
N. Nedovic
Nedovic
Crvena Zvezda
0.0491
0.04
0.1672
0.16
K. Baldwin
Baldwin
Baskonia
0.0478
0.04
0.3048
0.30
K. Papanikolaou
Papanikolaou
Olympiacos
0.0460
0.04
0.0637
0.06
An improved method for APM is RAPM, which attempts to correct the overfitting inherent in the regression used in APM, which is particularly prevalent in players with small sample sizes and introduces bias into the final results. For more details on APM and RAPM, see Adjusted Plus-Minus: An Idea Whose Time Has Come by Steve Ilardi and Measuring How NBA Players Help Their Teams Win by Dan T. Rosenbaum.
It is important to mention that the volume of data for this type of regression in FIBA basketball is usually much smaller than the volume of data available in the NBA—82 games per season; 48 min per game—, where data from several consecutive seasons are often used to eliminate the bias of small samples, so the relative value of this type of metrics applied to a limited number of games must be given.
Another highly interesting metric we’ve been able to apply to FIBA basketball is Box Plus/Minus (BPM), developed by Daniel Myers for Basketball Reference. BPM, unlike APM and RAPM, is based on both individual and team Boxscore statistics, which are used to calculate a player’s contribution. Different coefficients are applied to these Boxscore statistics, which are weighted and combined until the final value is obtained. The use of coefficients and the way in which the Boxscore statistics are combined were not designed subjectively or randomly, but were calculated so that the final results of the metric were as close as possible to the players’ RAPM, calculated over a sample of 14 seasons.
S. Vezenkov
Vezenkov
Olympiacos
7.16
7.16
T. J. Shorts
Shorts
Paris Basketball
6.34
6.34
F. Petrusev
Petrusev
Crvena Zvezda
5.78
5.78
N. Mirotic
Mirotic
EA7 Emporio Armani Milan
5.43
5.43
K. Nunn
Nunn
Panathinaikos
4.92
4.92
F. Campazzo
Campazzo
Real Madrid
4.33
4.33
D. Thompson
Thompson
Anadolu Efes
4.28
4.28
N. Weiler-Babb
Weiler-Babb
Bayern Munich
4.28
4.28
R. Beaubois
Beaubois
Anadolu Efes
4.2
4.2
K. Punter
Punter
FC Barcelona
4.15
4.15
N. Rogkavopoulos
Rogkavopoulos
Baskonia
4.12
4.12
V. Poirier
Poirier
Anadolu Efes
4.11
4.11
S. Larkin
Larkin
Anadolu Efes
4.09
4.09
T. Maledon
Maledon
ASVEL
4.03
4.03
M. Lessort
Lessort
Panathinaikos
3.72
3.72
We’ve also applied other metrics designed to analyze specific aspects of the game, such as BoxCreation and Offensive Load, created by Ben Taylor for Backpicks. These metrics attempt to measure a player’s generation capacity and usage in a way that’s different from the traditional USG% by also including his generation capacity data.
T. J. Shorts
Shorts
Paris Basketball
19.79
19.79
N. D. Colo
Colo
ASVEL
14.12
14.12
S. Francisco
Francisco
Žalgiris Kaunas
11.8
11.8
T. Blatt
Blatt
Maccabi Tel Aviv
11.72
11.72
K. Nunn
Nunn
Panathinaikos
11.49
11.49
T. Maledon
Maledon
ASVEL
11.29
11.29
F. Campazzo
Campazzo
Real Madrid
11.11
11.11
C. Jones
Jones
Partizan Belgrade
10.8
10.8
R. Jokubaitis
Jokubaitis
Maccabi Tel Aviv
10.69
10.69
K. Sloukas
Sloukas
Panathinaikos
10.52
10.52
M. Hermannsson
Hermannsson
Alba Berlin
10.49
10.49
E. Okobo
Okobo
AS Monaco
10.11
10.11
M. James
James
AS Monaco
10.06
10.06
Y. D. Santos
Santos
Crvena Zvezda
9.38
9.38
N. Nedovic
Nedovic
Crvena Zvezda
9.37
9.37
The use of these and other metrics, but especially visual analysis, a variety of external tools, and the design of reports tailored to the needs of the coaching staff have become essential for any basketball team to achieve its goals.